Wednesday, April 27, 2011

New World Order: the map of the Pentagon

New important French article with JS at the center:

"In 1932 Aldous Huxley published "The Brave New World", the anticipation of a world run by a tiny elite, where the majority of men, entertained and addicted only went even more account of deprivation of freedom that was theirs. In 1959, he admitted he was wrong, but only on the date of introduction of this nightmare: everything happened much faster than in his fiction. We are now in the beginnings of a New World Order that our elites promised us without hesitation it will be the best of worlds.

On September 11, 1990, President George Bush Sr. addressed the U.S. Congress in a speech marking a radical change in U.S. foreign policy, whose purpose was to be born that the U.S. president named for the first time New World Order:

"We stand today at a unique and extraordinary. (...) In these difficult times, our fifth objective, a New OrderWorld , can see the day: a new era, less threatened by terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which all countries of the world, whether in the East or West, North or South, can prosper and live in harmony. (...) Today, this new world is struggling to be born. A world quite different from what we experienced. " ...

Eleven years to the day after that speech, the events of September 11, 2001 were entered through his son, the U.S. in a war against "terrorism" to his son, GW Bush to radically change the face of the world as well in foreign and U.S..

On September 14, 2001, Bush decreed a state of emergency in the U.S. and put the country in an exceptional situation by passing the "Patriot Acts" and the laws of exceptions known under the term "Continuity of Government" him to overcome the international conventions and the constitution. The abduction, detention in camps without trial and torture became commonplace. Despite the scandals like Abu Ghraib, the state of emergency continues and even Obama can not close Guantanamo.

As we approach the anniversary of these two major events in politics, these unresolved conflicts in addition deep crises affecting not just the economy and industry, but also high finance, sovereign debt, natural resources and, even more dramatically since Fukushima, environment.

President Bush's promise of a New World Order ensuring prosperity and harmony to the peoples of the four corners of the planet is far from being a reality. Instead the conflict is growing, even if by the magic of the communication wars are adorned with humanitarian virtues, bringing, according to mainstream media, democracy in their bombs.

If the U.S. has learned anything from Vietnam is that in times of war, it is important to control the media.So it's not in the official media that he must go seeking information that will allow us to analyze and understand what's played on the contemporary geopolitical scene.

Since the U.S. is experiencing unipolar power, the most relevant information resides in documents emanating from the circle of strategic decision making of the USA, as the Pentagon and the Security Council.

This is what Thomas Barnett, professor of geo-strategy at the U.S. Naval War College and has published the results of its studies in a book entitled "The Pentagon's New Map." ...

Based on official documents he has compiled Barnett sets out the strategy that flows from the doctrine of the New World Order, which allows him to draw what he calls the "New Map of the Pentagon":

We understand that U.S. strategists the world is divided into two:

The "Core" (heart) of the globalized world consisting of Western countries, Russia, China, Africa, southern and south-eastern North America.

The "Gap" (ditch) of non-integrated global system which is almost all countries of the tropics, Africa, the Near East, North Korea, the Balkans and Turkey.

We can see a very strong correlation between areas of recent conflict and the area of the "gap" of non-integrated global system.

Barnett analyzes this card in the light of the doctrine monopolar put in place by the USA.

Paul Wolfowitz, Defense Secretary under Bush father and son, was summarized as follows:

"Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or anywhere, that would present a threat comparable to that of the former Soviet Union. This is the main concern underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we undertake to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, if he took control, be sufficient to make a global power. These regions include Europe, the Far East, the territories of the former Soviet Union and Southeast Asia.

There are three additional aspects to this objective:

First, the U.S. must show the leadership necessary to establish and guarantee a N ew O RDER Globalable to convince potential competitors that they should not aspire to a greater regional role or take a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests .

Second, in areas of non-defense, we must sufficiently represent the interests of industrialized countries so as to discourage them from competing with our leadership or seeking to overthrow the order established political and economic.

Finally, we must maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors that they are tempted to play a larger regional or global role. "

New Map of the Pentagon reflects precisely the pursuit of these objectives:

Countries that are not included in the New World Order must be compelled to do so by force or by the destabilization of the regime. Yugoslavia, faithful to the doctrine of non-alignment of Tito, made ​​the first cruel experience. The countries of the Arab Mediterranean is currently taking. Countries with resources to enable them to pursue a regional or even global competitor, must be fought. These resources are of course the oil and mineral wealth but also those that have sovereign wealth funds or powerful weapons. ...

The vassal states, integrated within the New World Order, are maintained at a level that they can never become competitors of the USA. As a sign of allegiance, they must harmonize their economic, judicial and political integration in order to further their governance by the world elite.

Representative parliamentary democracy within the meaning of the eighteenth century is no longer valid.

The New World Order implies that political issues be excluded from important public debate on the pretext of "good governance" in the words chosen by Javier Solana in the "European Security Strategy" that was ratified by the European Council on December 12, 2002.

The elections will therefore be no other effect than to swap personnel policy spin-doctoral, without the peoples have real influence on the political orientation of the country.

In exchange for the abdication in favor of "good governance" citizens will benefit from a body of law supposed to allow "A world where states recognize a common responsibility to ensure freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weakest. "According to G. Bush Senior (founder of speech NAME).

This substitute of democracy is embodied in the EU European Court of Human Rights but also by the principles of non discrimination can call into question the value of universal suffrage.

The "European Security Strategy" Javier Solana goes further, he has led the EU to accede unconditionally to the U.S. interventionist policy, endorsing the fight against terrorism, against weapons of mass destruction and other coverings that have allowed to bury self-determination and the principle of state sovereignty. ...

This shift has not been accepted without resistance in Europe. We remember the adjective "old Europe" in which Rumsfeld has expressed the fact that those who made resistance did not understand that times had changed.

There is also a passage from the "European Security Strategy", whose importance was not understood at the time, justified by the end of advance statements due to decay, a passage which sounds strange at the time of the sovereign debt crisis. V ere that Javier Solana wrote in 2002 :

"State failure : The bad governance, corruption, abuse of power, weak institutions and non-compliance with the obligation of accountability and civil conflict corrode States from within. "

Javiez Solana report entitled "A Secure Europe in a Better World."

The "better world" that we promise the supporters of the New World Order has similarities with that of Aldous Huxley described in his eponymous novel in 1932.

"Brave New World" describes what would be the perfect dictatorship: a dictatorship that would have the appearance of democracy, a prison without walls in which the prisoners would not dream of escape. A system of slavery where, through consumption and entertainment, the slaves "would love their servitude".

The similarities with contemporary society are already inspiring. Those with the regime of the New World Order could be even more.

State failure is the necessary path to migrate permanently to the states in the hands of global governance.

The financial and monetary crises will help achieve this self-fulfilling prophecy, discrediting the old system and allow the theory of "good governance" to replace the parliamentary statements "deliquescent".

This shift will not happen in Europe because it involves the collapse of the dollar which is the main basis of sovereign funds worldwide.

As a reminder, the Fund Sovereign UAE is $ 627 billion, that of Saudi Arabia $ 415 million, those from China totaled $ 1000M.

By comparison, the sovereign fund is less than U.S. $ 50 million.

In the U.S., the constitution and powers of Congress are already constrained by 10-year state of emergency.

The provision of Continuity of Government plan in case of financial crisis or FEMA money (and in practice the Pentagon) would take the reins of the country instead of civil authorities in all areas of life, financial, industrial, civic , education etc.. ...

The hypothesis of the massive devaluation of the dollar, following crack bonds would happen if the U.S. could not refinance their debt at the end of the QE2 in June 2011 is now seen as very realistic by financial experts.

Objectively, the fall of the $ would be undeniable strategic advantage for the USA. Overnight SWFs competitors found empty as balloons.

Internally, the political situation is chaotic but emergency measures to impose order exist and be activated legally.

The crisis is such that traditional institutions are all powerless.

Fortunately, our elites have accustomed us to think that the supranational organizations like the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, the International Financial Institution, the World Trade Organization, OSCE, EU, ​​MERCOSUR and ASEAN are the solutions of the problem.

Besides the global currency to the dollar to succeed already exists. To be honest there are even several contenders for a real battle going on right now to take advantage of his coming.

Technically it already exists: it is the Special Drawing Rights (Special Drawing Rights): a basket of Dollars, Euros, Yen and £ which serves as an exchange transaction of high finance. Because of its composition is gives him the nickname DEY (Dollar Euro Yen) but some had suggested they call the Terra.Its implementation is supported by the U.S. Single Global Currency Association

The LCMS has released a free in 2006 explaining the process of implementing the global currency: ...

Russian President Medvedev presented at the G8 Summit 2009 a part of the new coinage of the slogan "Unity in diversity".

The introduction of this currency was officially announced at the G20, the real question remains: what will be established this currency basket?

It is obvious that limiting the basket at $ Euro, Yen and £ is impossible, other currencies will therefore seek to develop. Their respective countries have mobilized to form so-called BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, Arabia).

Medvedev has clearly expressed the issue: it is for the BRICS take their place in the future institutions of global finance.

Certainly a legitimate desire but in complete opposition to the objectives of the New World Order as theorized by Donald Rumsfed.

A global revolution is preparing in the etymological sense of the term, which will see the end of the period when the dollar was the currency in the world, but also the end of industrial civilization, which productivist exponential demand for natural resources n is more sustainable.

A new world order is being set up financially as he has already arranged his troops on the planet.

Will he dreamed monopolar empire by the neo-conservatives or neo-conservatives have they been the instrument even more powerful forces of global finance that led to deliberately plan the revolution ?

In any event, the history of mankind has reached a critical phase and novel approach which inevitably climax either through the will of some powerful or duress that Nature imposes on everyone.

These powerful they have mastered the game where they simply take advantage of a systemic crisis inevitable anyway?

Whatever the answer we should expect to radically change our value systems, our certainties and our worldview.

The best world is that we accept.

Aldous Huxley wrote in 1959 "Twenty-seven years later (...) I am much less optimistic than I was writing Brave New World. The prophecies made in 1931 are realized much sooner than I thought. (...) Meanwhile, impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to push us all in the direction of the nightmare of my anticipation and this pulse is deliberately dehumanized accelerated by the representatives of business organizations and policies that have developed many new techniques to manipulate in the interest of some minority, the thoughts and feelings of the masses. What are these impersonal forces that are trying to make the world safe for so few democracies, if not hospitable to individual freedom and why the nightmare that I had projected in the seventh century F., he argued if quickly towards us? "

"In the Brave New World of my fable, the problem of the relationship between the number of human and natural resources had been resolved: a figure has been calculated for optimum world population, he maintained, generation after generation. In the real world today, nothing has been done. Instead, this problem becomes more serious and more dangerous with each passing year and it is in this grim backdrop that will play all biological dramas political, economic, psychological and intellectual of our time. " ...

His words, half a century old yet perfectly summarize the current state of the world and the recklessness with which we kept trying to imagine our world forever."

No comments: